This section provides a quick guide on how to prepare the drainage database file, an input file that contains the network topology and characteristics of the domain used in MESH simulations. A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) file and a land class file (in GeoTIFF or Shapefile format) are processed by the Green Kenue software to create the file.


Page contents:

Software requirements

Green Kenue 3.4.30

A newer version of Green Kenue is required than the version available online from National Research Council Canada.

For members of the Global Institute for Water Security, installation files for the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the software are located at \\jade\WaterSecurity\Princz\GreenKenue. For others, these files can be transferred by request.

To determine what version of Green Kenue has been installed, from Green Kenue:

Data requirements

The following examples use a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) product in BIL format and land cover data in GeoTIFF format.

Pre-processing the Digital Elevation Model (DEM)

A Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is a gridded "raster" dataset that contains a collection of cells defined by georeferenced elevation, such as an altitude in feet or meters above some reference, such as mean seal level (MSL).

The DEM is used to derive channel hydrology and build a database of hydrological parameters, predominantly used in the routing scheme.

Provided the nature of deriving hydrology from a DEM, using a "hydrologically conditioned" DEM is recommended. A hydrologically conditioned DEM is one where the elevations in cells have been modified to remove pits (i.e., sources where flow can get trapped) and channels may have been "burned in" (e.g., by an unnatural drop in elevation along channel lines) to force processors to find pre-defined channels.

Some DEMs are already hydrologically conditioned in this way, such as HydroSHEDS and MERIT Hydro.

Larger DEMs should be clipped to a regional scale representative of the domain, where possible. However, the DEM should not be clipped to the exact extents of the desired watershed. Instead, a modest buffer should be applied to the true extend of the watershed, and that buffer should be used to clip the DEM. Refer to the resources for examples.

Considerations

At a minimum:

Ideally:

Output format

Resources

Pre-processing land cover and other geospatial fabrics

Other geospatial fabrics may include land cover and soils information datasets. These datasets can be used to derive Grouped Response Units (GRUs) and to create fully-distributed datasets (if the GRU approach is not used).

Considerations

If using the GRU approach:

Output format

Resources - GRU approach

GRUs can be defined from a single geospatial fabric, such as land cover or ecodistricts, or a result of the combination of multiple data sources, such as land cover merged with soils information. These datasets should be merged, simplified, and combined to create a reasonable number of GRUs. Having too many GRUs can make parameterization of the model more difficult.

Some datasets may already combine different geospatial fabrics, such as the National Ecological Framework of Canada. Using an existing dataset that already combines the fields of interest may lessen the tasks required for pre-processing the file for mapping to the model grid.


Resources - Fully-distributed approach

Where data is available, it may be desirable to assign fully-distributed fields for parameters and not use the GRU approach to define parameter groups. Even in this case, the datasets may need to be pre-processed before mapping them to the model grid.

Related pages